Blog dedicated to reporting on Mexican drug cartels
on the border line between the US and Mexico
.

Friday, March 15, 2024

More Than 50 Countries In America And Europe Urge To Abandon The Repressive Approach In The Fight Against Drugs

"Sol Prendido" for Borderland Beat




The divisions over international drug policy were evident this Thursday with the demands of almost 60 States, mostly from America and Europe, to abandon the current repressive approach in the international anti-drug strategy.

This request occurred at the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna, the highest international body on drug policies, which this Thursday and Friday is reviewing the strategy approved in 2019, when it marks half of its decade of application.

The president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, denounced in a video message that the current anti-drug strategy “has failed” and that the UN cannot be “deaf and blind” to the need for a new approach that privileges public health over criminalization. 

Criticism even came from the United Nations, with Volker Türk, High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling the punitive strategies used so far “ineffective and counterproductive.”

Criminalization policies, including the death penalty, “have not decreased drug use or deterred related violence,” Türk said.

Lives ruined

In fact, he charged, this strategy resulted in “more and more lives ruined not only by drug use itself, but also by the counterproductive consequences of those policies, such as mass incarceration, stigmatized, impoverished communities and plagued by violence.”

In 2019, the countries of the Commission adopted a declaration that promoted “a society free of drug abuse” and committed to working to eliminate the cultivation, production, trafficking and consumption of narcotics by 2029.

Achieving these objectives is impossible, according to the UN's own data, which highlights that the drug market, both traditional and synthetic, is at historic highs, with more users, more narcotics and more deaths related to their use.

At the beginning of this Thursday's meeting, the States of the Commission adopted a continuing political declaration with the 2019 objectives, based on a minimum consensus due to the rejection of any reform by countries such as Russia, Iran or Arab nations.

According to diplomatic sources, there were even fears that Russia could block the declaration due to its mention of respect for the human rights of drug addicts.

The IDCP, a network of almost 200 human rights NGOs calling for reform of anti-drug policies, denounced that this statement does not recognize the failures of the current system, despite the “hundreds of thousands of people who die each year due to harmful policies.” 

Response to immobility

In response to this immobility, a group of 59 countries, including the main European powers, the United States, Canada, and numerous Latin American countries, such as Mexico, Brazil and Colombia, issued an alternative declaration in which they call for abandoning the repressive approach and addressing the problem as a public health issue.

“The international drug control system, as it is currently applied, needs a rethinking based on concrete evidence, so that we can begin to move forward together,” Colombian Foreign Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo said in the plenary session. when reading the joint statement.

“Prioritizing people in drug responses is part of our broader efforts: this means prioritizing public health, developing prevention initiatives, removing the stigma associated with drug use disorders,” the minister said. 

Given the lack of consensus to undertake global reforms, more and more States are deciding to try solutions that violate international standards, such as the legalization of cannabis consumption.

This path, which Uruguay began last decade and which is also applied by two dozen states in the United States and Canada, and which has recently been approved by Germany, is the most evident example of a broken international consensus.

These divergences occur at a time of an unprecedented rise in synthetic drugs, such as fentanyl, which has caused hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths in the United States since 2019.

The executive director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Ghada Waly, called for unity to address an increasingly “complex” crisis, and recognized that synthetic substances already dominate the markets.

Waly highlighted that it is the demand that motivates the entire illegal drug business and the associated violence, which has a "devastating" result.

“There are not enough police or law enforcement that is going to end the illicit drug market while there is this enormous demand,” she summarized.



Latinus

59 comments:

  1. They need to cut the head off the snake and stop the FUNDING. They are the ones funding them. With out funds the cartels can’t pay thier soldiers can’t buy ammo and weapons and won’t be able to pay off the military and Mexican police with the funds they are being given. Stop the corruption stop the stupid ass war on drugs cause the shit ain’t working.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 821 Ironically the "FUNDING " you're alluding to comes from U.S taxpayers, which is given to Mexico in form of military equipment but never cash. It's a money laundering scheme for the military industrial complex because Mexico, Columbia and the rest of Latin America only see the equipment but never the taxpayers money. That taxpayers money goes into the hands of the U.S companies making the equipment. Under AMLO though, things changed. The president opted to produce some of their own military equipment like assault rifles, ammo, uniforms and vehicles while buying other military equipment from, China, Russia and a few other euro companies. The way AMLO avoided laundering U.S taxpayer dollars from the U.S military suppliers was by receiving training from the U.S government instead of helicopters, machine guns, drones and ammo . By receiving training instead of equipment AMLO was still able to honor the agreement both countries have for combating these CTO's without contributing to the greed that fills their pockets and perpetuates the fake war on drugs... Just think of how the U.S helps Isreal and Ukraine in the form of weapons. We send them weapons not money. Those weapons are produced by private companies, not the government.

      Delete
    2. @9:39 I want in on the pow wow too bro shit

      Delete
    3. 9:39 Astute comments - but I am skeptic about the money laundering allegation.
      Why would US based defense companies need to launder money from receivables billed to our US government.
      Your comment was 100% correct as far as I see; other than the laundering allegation of US recipients of the billions spent thru Merida.

      Delete
    4. 412 Yes I know, "money laundering" is not the proper term but neither is "racketeering" or "embezzlement". It's definitely a scheme of some sort to take as much of our tax revenue and put it into their pockets by immoral and unethical means while still being considered "legal".

      Delete
  2. Ok🤔 let me see the United Nations offers advice, that it's not working ....well let's have the US stop the yearly funding in the millions, to Mexico, Columbia etc., on drug deterrent.
    Then watch the crybabies take it back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha you’re delusional. Americans need their drugs. Especially with this economy and stress from life. Alcohol does equal damage yet it’s perfectly legal, why can’t drugs be a controlled substance?

      Delete
    2. 9:25 no compredes los que deci 8:55, estas loco.😸🤣😂

      Delete
    3. 925 Is correct. I live In a nice neighborhood. I have three households around me that each have a few alcoholics. People are drinking, smoking and snorting a lot. Facts. Declining middle class, marriage problems, social media influencing kids, many only have 2 weeks off a year... People commuting more to work than seeing their kids. Rough for weak minded, no will power people.

      Delete
    4. 9:25 is incorrect, way of course possibly on drugs 😂 lol.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  3. 50 countries in America??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lmao ! I had the same question. What’s going on here

      Delete
    2. Yeah, Yeah. People make, (type), mistakes.

      Delete
    3. 10:57 Some mistakes are not forgiven.

      Delete
    4. "the Americas" would be the grammar call here, but why nitpick, it's a good translation by the busy as a beaver sr. Sol..
      🦎

      Delete
    5. Propaganda stunt seems everyone thinks they can backstab Uncle Sam, but Uncle Sam always gets back up.
      Just like SEDENA claimed a bogus amount of weapons were coming into Mexico from the borders, then someone mentioned, if they saw them coming in , why didn't they do something about it.

      Delete
    6. Lol new nick name .
      "Beaver Sol"

      Delete
    7. I wish I found that funny.

      Delete
  4. Calm down George soros

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is this the stepping stone to change the current tactics in combating drug smugglers, and use military option?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Military option? What a joke. The fact republicans and democrats got together to ban TikTok, but not find solutions for inflation and the economy just shows the Us government is a joke and only works for the best interest for them. They no longer represent the American people. It’s all about control, they want to control the media, the drug trade everything you name it. And they turn around and call china and Russia the bad one. People should’ve woke up after Bush went in no lube on American rights with his “patriot act”.

      Delete
    2. Oh please it’s all show. They’re never going to stop the drug flow. Too much money is falling into their hands.

      Delete
    3. 10:10
      President and congress have little control over the economy and inflation.

      Delete
  6. 52, add Puerto Rico and American Samoa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn I didn’t know the US had 50 countries

      Delete
    2. You might read again, its 50 states in america and europe!

      Delete
    3. Umm… these are NOT countries. Wow.

      Delete
    4. 53, American Virgin islands.

      Delete
    5. 50 Countries is too much for 🌎 Earth, the could not even list the so called Countries, talk about over exacurating.
      Dios Mio give me a break.

      Delete
    6. Looks like many youngsters have not taken Geography Class yet.
      There are States in the USA.
      USA is a Country.

      Delete
    7. U.S. gave back the panama canal zone, yeahbut the gringos still run the show..
      Greenbacks remain Panama's national currency..
      Only 49 u.s. states in the Americas, Hawaii sitting pretty in Oceana..
      🦎

      Delete
  7. The most major difference between legal and illegal is the price. This is where powerful people comes in,its lots and lots of money.
    While it has been illegal pandemics after pandemics has happened,it did not do anything.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Your paragraph literally made zero sense. Nice try on trying to sound smart though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1014am fuck that word salad paragraph gave me a headache reading it lolol

      Delete
    2. 10:48 hahah I’m dead

      Delete
    3. And when a dentist gets a headache, you better watch out!

      Delete
    4. Dentists have access to pharmaceutical cocaine
      🧐🤔

      Delete
    5. 4:43 Really? I know they have access to the caines (Arti, Lido and Novo/Pro) in concentrated form although I would assume it's in liquid. 🐊

      Delete
  9. It is an intelligent, reflective, thoughtful article. The current war on drugs has created more drugs, a larger market and lower prices for all available narcotics, which is basically anything anywhere in the world so well done war on drugs you’ll be solving the problem with intervention very soon. I’m not sure how many trillions of dollars of US taxpayer money we have wasted but it’s time to stop. There are numerous studies in Canada and Europe and other countries that show a management approach to the problem to be a more effective solution for both Addicts and society at large. Well done Sol.
    As for the rest of you try thinking with your brain about the situation, and the results of the current interventionist criminalistic approach to a social problem. By the way sounds like that will work as soon as Hell freezes over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No its another cry for money from the NGOs. This request should be ignored cause the logical consequences would be legal heroin and fentanillo. Thats bullshit talk.

      Delete
    2. No,mijo.. It's the truth..

      Delete
    3. 10.56 Good comment, but there are no absolutes in human behavior.
      Decriminalize all drug use and call it a health issue you get Oregon and San Francisco, now reinstating old laws to get control of their streets back.
      If optional drug use is a health issue, how many billions will need to be spent on new hospitals, "health" centers and staff to treat the "patients"? And after they're treated, (voluntarily, of course) will the "patients" be healed and become productive members of society contributing to the tax base like other healthy people?

      Delete
    4. They found out that emergency calls and hospital stays,etc., cost more than just housing these people.

      Delete
    5. Oregon and San Fransico might be examples of decriminalization not being implemented effectively but they are just that. It does not mean that it can’t work and shouldn’t happen.

      Delete
  10. The only reason the so called drug war drags is unresolved is because the USA wants it that way. There is a thriving drug war industry that would collapse once victory is reached. Like a lot of examples there is no money in the cure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nah this is nonsense. you can't win the 'drug war' militarily. say america invades mexico controls the entire territory and represses drug production 100%. ok that's possible. but now the drug production will just happen in another country. what are you gonna do?

      Delete
    2. False - Drug War easily winnable if taking fight to the participants. No need to invade countries. Participants are within reach and excessible. Sure cartel is a challenge for unarmed civilians and corrupted governments. But if a real fighting force confronted them the fight would be over in hours. There is no will to do that because the drug war and associated misery is in the interest of the USA.

      Delete
    3. @3:32 you really just said: “fight would be over in hours” , that’s crazy . Similar to what happened in Afghanistan and Vietnam I’m sure you guys thought it would end in “hours” . Cartels can be taken down , but definitely not in hrs day or months and only with the Mexican government in agreement.

      Delete
    4. Hours - Command and Control can be destroyed immediately. We are talking about attacking what is basically a non fortified opponent or position. This is not a difficult opponent for a well armed force. Once C&C gone and the underlings see someone brought a real fight, they lay down thier arms and fall in line.

      And it does not take a USA level military to get the job done quickly. Take a look at El Salvador. Thier President loves his people and says no more of this. He has the means and the will and problem resolved. His greatest opponent is USA whose propaganda machine trying to make him appear to be the bad guy. That should give you a good indication for how it is in the interests of some USA factions for this misery to continue.

      Delete
    5. 729 is on some call of duty strategery talk. 🤣🤣🤣🤣.

      Delete
    6. @7 29 i'm not disagreeing that they want it to continue, just disagree that they could win the war if they wanted to. it's not winnable. you have to just decriminalise drugs to take the money out of it and destroy the criminal industry that way. or it will never end.

      Delete
  11. Legalize is the only solution but hundreds of billions 💰 for funding the war on drugs so many institutions, jobs, money laundering, black money
    funds 3 letter agencies will have to get somewhere else. Don't just look at the surface dig deeper. It's more profitable illegal. Not for a second will I believe world government gives a flying fuck about the populous health or well being.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mijo legalize won't work.

      Delete
    2. Boomer just put on your ear plugs and put on the new apple goggles and croak. Supplies are always available illegally so users have access regardless why not legalized it and take the profits out for criminals org and corrupt entities and let natural selection takes it course let the true addicts and junkies get weeded out and the new wave generation that's on the legalization make there choice if they want to follow the same route as the past users simple as is illegal or legal access and supplies will not diminish it's a fuckin commodity even the synthetics it's high on demand but I personally believe once you take the illegality rebellious kids will find some other vice than drugs hell maybe there anger and energy will be used for revolution over the current flawed and fraudulent systems

      Delete
    3. Legalize guns in Mexico too.

      Delete

Comments are moderated, refer to policy for more information.
Envía fotos, vídeos, notas, enlaces o información
Todo 100% Anónimo;

borderlandbeat@gmail.com