Tuesday, March 22, 2011

A Smarter Drug Interdiction Policy for Mexico

By: Vanda Felbab-Brown
The Brookings Institution

President Felipe Calderón visited Washington earlier this month amid a significant escalation in drug-related violence in Mexico and strained relations with the United States. However, it is critical that dissatisfaction on both sides does not give rise to purely symbolic actions aimed at placating concerns rather than achieving real results in ending the Mexican drug wars. Neither the United States nor Mexico will benefit from more frequent but less strategic hits against Mexico's drug gangs. Ramping up of the campaign against Mexico's drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) without being truly strategic may satisfy some critics, but it will not enhance the necessary development of law enforcement, justice and corrections institutions in Mexico that are needed to make real headway in ending the Mexican drug wars. Counterproductively, non-strategic action will likely further increase the violence and decrease Mexican public support for the effort in the long term.

The shooting of two U.S. law enforcement agents in Mexico last month marked another escalation of the bloody drug war that has claimed more than 34,000 lives since Calderón came to power. Statements by U.S. officials questioning Mexico's capacity and stability have angered Calderón. He recently lashed out against what he described as U.S. distortions and exaggerations while blaming the United States for failing to stop the flow of U.S. guns to Mexico and reduce demand for drugs.

Reducing demand in the United States would be enormously helpful not only for law enforcement, but also for decreasing other social costs of drug use. The Obama administration has emphasized demand reduction and modestly increased demand-reduction spending. But even with a bigger budget and better knowledge about the effectiveness of various demand reduction policies, reducing demand in the United States will take a long time. Moreover, Mexican DTOs are already branching out into other rackets, such as extortion of businesses, human smuggling and kidnapping.

While investigations show that 90 percent of identified weapons used by Mexican DTOs originate in the United States, focusing on the weapons flows as the mechanism to reduce the violence in Mexico is a red herring. The Obama administration has undertaken several initiatives to combat the weapons flows. But U.S. gun laws make increasing the interdiction rate difficult, and stopping guns at borders is as hard as stopping drugs at borders. The global market of small arms is fully integrated — even if U.S. law enforcement was able to shut down the flows, Mexican criminals would buy the weapons elsewhere. Most importantly, weapons availability does not seem to greatly influence strategic violence by criminal organizations. Analyses of violence levels after changes in weapons laws and weapons-collection drives show that smaller availability of weapons does reduce unpremeditated violence, including domestic or street disputes escalating into armed assaults. These are important improvements. But there is little indication that such anti-gun measures reduce strategic warfare among criminal organizations or against the state. In the United States, the same Mexican DTOs operate with even a greater access to weapons, but are nowhere as violent as in Mexico.

A key reason for the violence in Mexico is the way interdiction operations have been carried out - focusing the hollowed-out law enforcement and justice sector on high-value targets, such as top capos, and arresting tens of thousands of foot soldiers, while the middle layer of DTO operators has not been severely affected.

After decades of underdevelopment and corruption, neither the judicial nor the corrections systems in Mexico have caught up with the drug-trade challenge. Many petty drug pushers end up doing a year-or-two stint in overcrowded prisons that serve as higher education for criminals and more deeply anchor them in the cartels' grasp. A complete overhaul of the justice system could not be expected to proceed rapidly. Police reform in Mexico, given the level of corruption, technical deficiencies and complexity of police institutions, was bound to take at minimum a decade.

Non-strategic, high-value targeting on the basis of incremental intelligence without consideration of what kind of turf wars it will provoke is one reason behind Mexico's violence. Without prior or simultaneous arrests of middle commanders, DTO leadership easily regenerates. The temporary weakening of a DTO that just suffered the arrest of a narcojefe tempts other groups to try to take over its turf. To reduce such regeneration, interdiction operations in the United States frequently arrest hundreds of cartel members at once, including as much of the middle layer as possible, often having built up intelligence over several years. But the lack of strategic intelligence capacity in Mexico and the fear that intelligence will leak out prematurely put a premium on quick, high-value targeting.

Expanding targeting to the middle layer needs to become a key feature of the strategy in Mexico, along with a steadfast institutional development and social policies to reduce communities' vulnerability to crime. Reducing violence equally needs to be integrated into strategy - otherwise, public support in Mexico will continue to weaken and temptations by local officials to strike deals with the narcos will increase.

Sources:http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/0312_mexico_drugs_felbabbrown.aspx

8 comments:

  1. The last paragraph is exactly what I commented a week or so ago...
    I was critical of going after leaders as it does little and only temporary instablilty, and has made thing wosre.

    Must go after the middle layer...and judicial reform; the standard of proof has changed but is now so convulated everyone is confused and the standard to strict. reformation of prisons, sentencing including death penalty which congress has been talking about for crimes such as those committed by cartel, and last but no way least...restructure of educational system giving educational opportunity to all children equally, socio and economic overhaul as well. until then...ni-ni poulation will provide a wide recruitment field for MDC-MOCs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. PS..a key arrestof The Teacher (was on the most wanted list ) jose natividad cortez leader of LFM



    http://www.pgr.gob.mx/servicios/fugitivos/opera_consulta.asp?tipo=img&orden=paterno&sexo=A&status=A&TamPagina=0&imgini=0

    ReplyDelete
  3. You know since everything comes back to the "U.S. need" for illegal drugs , I have heard this solution offered up more than once:
    All drugs confiscated in the U.S. should be treated with a poison (a substance with a 7 to 10 day activation period, so that it can be well distributed before it takes effect so that no one gets alarmed.}then the drugs can be re-introduced into the chain of distribution. Thus effectively wiping out the majority of Drug Users in this country and certainly deterring the future ones. I do agree in 6 months, we will have less crime, less need to import illegal drugs. No need to legalize just sanitize. I admit this sounds like a drastic measure but "drastic times need drastic measures". Better 10 drug users die than 1 innocent. It is an Idea though....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Take the money,cars planes,ranches apartments,condo,business,etc. Do not let them launder the money. Do not let anything of substance be bought for cash ,where did the money come from?? Create huge taxes on drugs,convict DTO of tax evasion,sieze their property NO $ NO Corruption,use the $ to fund reforms in govt,trade schools,teachers salarys, improve the lives of the peons who fuel the labor needs of DTO.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Buela

    So what you are saying is leave Chapo and the narco "elite" alone? You know this isn't the first time I hear you say something like that...I don't know what infatuation people have with that animal. I respect your opinion Buela but leaving the Big Timers alone is not an option. I guess people still think he's the knight in shiny armor coming to save the land from the Zetas!

    777

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ 7:00 or instead of committing genocide you could stop telling people what they can and cannot put in their bodies and let people be responsible for their own lives, thus eliminating the need for an illegal drug market. Fucking moron.

    ReplyDelete
  7. hey!!!!!10:38
    I could care less what you put in your body or where you choose to put it>>>>>
    But when my tax dollars have to go to pay the welfare, Medical expense, and live with the crime that Druggies cause, Not to mention pay to raise and rehabilitate the children of drug users, who are so damn selfish that something to put up their nose or smoke is more important than the safety and well being of their own children. Yeah, you gotta right to smoke anything you want, Just don't involve anyone in anyway to help you do it. Cause, yes, I would let you die...Moron

    ReplyDelete
  8. So WHY doe the U S not demand responsible(no drug) conduct from our citizens?? Instead our Govt U S subsidises low class worthless people at the expense of those who work and pay taxes,allowing everybody to vote has resulted in the dimanteling of our once productive society,and has disillusioned,angered those who are carrying the weight of this grand liberal experiment.I am more angry about Drug use in the U S than the Mexicans, the Mexicans are making money off the low class Americans and we are paying to support them.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated, refer to policy for more information.
Envía fotos, vídeos, notas, enlaces o información
Todo 100% Anónimo;

borderlandbeat@gmail.com