"Socalj" for Borderland Beat
![]() |
President Donald J. Trump officially signed the HALT Fentanyl Act into law, permanently classifying fentanyl-related substances as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act.
As President Trump said, the legislation is “delivering another defeat for the savage drug smugglers and criminals and the cartels."
The bill, introduced in Congress earlier this year, permanently places fentanyl-related substances as a class into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. A Schedule I controlled substance is a drug, substance, or chemical that has a high potential for abuse; has no currently accepted medical value; and is subject to regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal penalties under the Controlled Substances Act.
As President Trump said, the legislation is “delivering another defeat for the savage drug smugglers and criminals and the cartels."
The bill, introduced in Congress earlier this year, permanently places fentanyl-related substances as a class into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. A Schedule I controlled substance is a drug, substance, or chemical that has a high potential for abuse; has no currently accepted medical value; and is subject to regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal penalties under the Controlled Substances Act.
However, with fentanyl already a major target of law enforcement, and a majority of the drug smuggling coming from non-medical production of the drug and counterfeit pain pills containing fentanyl. Many believe the main defeat of rescheduling the drug is the medical and surgical communities with fentanyl being used for local anesthesia and to treat chronic severe pain or severe pain following surgery.
On June 10, 2025, the DEA provided their recommendation to reschedule fentanyl and its analogues citing the abuse of the drug by its users.
The term “abuse” is not defined in the CSA; however, the legislative history of the CSA suggests that DEA consider the following criteria when determining whether a particular drug or substance has a potential for abuse:
(a) There is evidence that individuals are taking the drug or drugs containing such a substance in amounts sufficient to create a hazard to their health or to the safety of other individuals or to the community; or
(b) There is significant diversion of the drug or drugs containing such a substance from legitimate drug channels; or
(c) Individuals are taking the drug or drugs containing such a substance on their own initiative rather than on the basis of medical advice from a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drugs in the course of his professional practice; or
(d) The drug or drugs containing such a substance are new drugs so related in their action to a drug or drugs already listed as having a potential for abuse to make it likely that the drug will have the same potentiality for abuse as such drugs, thus making it reasonable to assume that there may be significant diversions from legitimate channels, significant use contrary to or without medical advice, or that it has a substantial capability of creating hazards to the health of the user or to the safety of the community.
(a) There is evidence that individuals are taking the drug or drugs containing such a substance in amounts sufficient to create a hazard to their health or to the safety of other individuals or to the community; or
(b) There is significant diversion of the drug or drugs containing such a substance from legitimate drug channels; or
(c) Individuals are taking the drug or drugs containing such a substance on their own initiative rather than on the basis of medical advice from a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drugs in the course of his professional practice; or
(d) The drug or drugs containing such a substance are new drugs so related in their action to a drug or drugs already listed as having a potential for abuse to make it likely that the drug will have the same potentiality for abuse as such drugs, thus making it reasonable to assume that there may be significant diversions from legitimate channels, significant use contrary to or without medical advice, or that it has a substantial capability of creating hazards to the health of the user or to the safety of the community.
Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote.
Under the bill, offenses involving fentanyl-related substances are triggered by the same quantity thresholds and subject to the same penalties as offenses involving fentanyl analogues (e.g., offenses involving 100 grams or more trigger a 10-year mandatory minimum prison term).
The White House says a key national fentanyl overdose prevention grant program, currently underfunded by roughly $140 million, will eventually be fully paid for, but with a catch.The federal money allocated by Congress will now be given out "in increments" rather than a single annual payment. Initially it was thought that the $9 billion in funding to the CDC would be cut. The prevention program largely helps to supply narcan to hospitals, first responders and some schools.
Sources White House, US Congress, NPR, DEA, DEA
No more Narcan. Let natural selection do its thing.
ReplyDeleteMan I gotta agree. I banged dope for 11 years..speedballs for 6. Some addicts are beyond help and just drains on society. I never ODed...not once. You gotta be an idiot to OD. It always some popping benzos or drinking that ODs.
DeleteSays the idiot.
DeleteHard to cure a dopefiend of the habit, they get married to it.
DeleteEven if they finally kick, that dog is always barking.
Once I was given narcan was confused until I was told it is because I take Xanax and was given pain killers norcos at emergency room. That was enough for me to be scared and I either took the Xanax or pain killer never both same day. But some that OD I’m surprised they lived that long. They drink alcohol take meth pills and fentanyl all at once.
DeleteI can't believe that marijuana is still considered a schedule I drug along with heroin and fentanyl. If they want people to take this list seriously they need to take out marijuana. While your at that also take out ecstasy. I put a little of that in Buffy's drink so she can get freaky with me. Nuff Said!!!
ReplyDeleteIf you work as a special agent in the federal government, you going understand why marijuana is very important to still be classified schedule 1.
DeleteIf accidently injested, Narcan is excellent. For any reason, save lives.
ReplyDeleteComo pueden esos junkys hablaren de mi bello y moralizado Mexico si ni ellos pueden arreglar sus pedos ya creen que pueden arreglar el jale de drogas en MX pura broma
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/eMJjjvTd54U?si=TxFJUi-Gsz6-D46w
ReplyDeleteChihuahua going crazy right now.
Unbelievable or justified?
ReplyDeleteI find this classification a tool to incarcerate more people. A business practice where private security firms will continue to reap the benefits with wealth.
This drug war is not working.
Expect more underserved poverty stricken people given harsh sentences for little quantities of possession.
We need a better solution to this epidemic.