This is an old article 
from 1995 which details the rise of the narco state within Mexico, including many 
politicians who remain free to this day.  It is truly a telling account
 of how interwoven the narco economy is with a political machine tailored to the elites.  While most of these kingpins are either dead or in prison, most of those who facilitated the narcos power remain free.  For this to have been written 17 years ago shows remarkable insight on the part of Peter Lupsha.     
By Peter Lupsha
Under the Volcano: Narco Investment in Mexico
 
While President Clinton worked to create sand castles on the tidal flat that 
is Haiti, on the great and vital landmass to the south volcanic pressures and 
violent eruptions squeezed and shook a political system that is critical to US 
national interest.
Haiti sits near the bottom of any rational listing of US vital interests, 
while Mexico stands at the apex of any hemispheric agenda. Mexico is the gateway 
to Central and South America. 
As we go beyond NAFTA, Mexico is the hinge on 
which The South America Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) will turn. 
President Carlos Salinas de Gortari recognized this, and his foreign policy 
genius placed him in the front rank of hemispheric leaders. He and his aides 
brilliantly orchestrated Mexico's interaction with the United States in the 
NAFTA negotiations, spending millions on Congressional lobbying and persuasion 
and targeting the US-Mexican community with a huge public relations outreach 
campaign. he also made important structural changes, investments and 
infrastructure development in ports, highways and airports to lure US financial 
and investor support. 
Finally, almost single handedly, he sold NAFTA to the 
Central American nations and South America. Not only did he open Mexico's 
southern door to smoother trade relations with the Central American nations, he 
opened the door further south with Colombia and Venezuela in the G-3. No 
President in Mexico's history has had greater hemispheric foreign policy 
successes than Salinas de Gortari.
To create strength in this area, however, he had to deal with the entrenched 
and often corrupt power centers in the 'old guard' in the PRI. He had to 
maintain the Presidential office structure and staff (EMP), and he appointed 
Fernando Gutierrez Barrios to Gobernacion and named Enrique Alvarez-Castillo to 
head the Attorney General's Office (PGR). Such key first appointments 
facilitated continued to flourish despite his attempts at change. 
Salinas 
appointed five different Attorneys General during his term, and only one, Jorge 
Carpizo McGregor, had any impact on narco-penetration and corruption. According 
to El Financiero, Carpizo controlled by the large drug trafficking 
organizations. Under other Attorneys General, as much as 95 percent of the PGR 
was under narco-control. Thus, Mexico's justice agency was in reality an arm of 
drug trafficking, and organized crime's government intermediary.
This lack of vigilance not only led to the death of Cardinal Juan Jesus 
Posadas Ocampo, it resulted in the assassination of Salinas de Gortari's 
political son and heir, Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) presidential 
candidate Luis Donaldo Colosio. For both fell victim of the complacency and/or 
complicity of politicians corrupted by drug trafficking, or were overwhelmed and 
intimidated by narco-power.
Lorenzo Meyer, Colegio de Mexico historian and international relations 
specialist, has noted that Mexico has contributed very little to political 
theory. 
For the reality that applies to actual power in Mexico is: 'caudillo, 
power, cacique power, authoritarianism, patrimonialism or patronage.' Thus, 
Mexico's contribution to political theory, he says, 'is but a footnote and 
nothing to be proud of. The 'morbida', [bribe]; the 'tapado', [the as yet 
unrevealed official candidate], and the 'dedazo' [hand picking of political 
candidates].' To this list he might have added 'palanca' [influence], pezgordo 
[influential], who is often 'intocable' [untouchable], and the 'madrinos' 
[godmothers'], Federal and State Judicial Police (PJF & PJE) and 
commissioned agent-informers, who frequently work for both the drug trafficking 
organizations and the state. 
All of the above work to assist and support the 
infrastructure of narco corruption and narcopower in Mexico.
According to Meyer, Mexico's key theoretical contributions to our political 
future will be the post-modern 'indigenous' guerrilla force, and the post-modern 
party of the state born in the Presidential election of August 21, 1994. As 
volcanic tremors continue, Meyer may be proven correct, and in ways that even he 
did not dare contemplate.
A Brief History of Recent Drug Trafficking in Mexico
 
The U.S. government estimates that 50 percent of the cocaine shipped by 
Colombian organized crime groups towards the United States transits through 
Mexico. This reflects the fact that since the 1970s Colombian drug trafficking 
groups have been developing working relationships with their Mexican 
counterparts.
Honduran, Juan Ramon Matta Ballesteros connected Alberto Sicilia Falcon to 
Colombian, Benjamin Herrera Zuelta known in Colombia as 'the Black Pope of 
Cocaine', is intellectual father of the current Cali cartel leaders, and 
paternal father of Helmer 'Pacho' Herrera Buitrago of that group. After Sicilia 
Falcon's arrest, Matta Ballesteros became the contact to Miguel Angel Felix 
Gallardo, who via Matta's Colombian connections became 'El Padrino', the cocaine 
czar of Mexico, and premier leader of the Guadalajara Cartel of the 1980s.
The other leaders if the group, Ernesto Fonseca Carrillo and Rafael Caro 
Quintero, and their associates, never possessed the high level contacts of Felix 
Gallardo. Only Juan Jose Esparragoza Moreno ('El Azul') is now free and a very 
important 'statesman' in Colombian/Mexican drug trafficking circles. 
This cartel 
controlled high-level Mexican cocaine and marijuana trafficking until 1985, when 
the murders of DEA agent Enrique Camarena Salazar and his Mexican pilot brought 
international attention and pressure to the cartel and the eventual arrests of 
the leadership.
Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo was only arrested in 1989. And even after his 
imprisonment, he remained one of Mexico's major traffickers, maintaining his 
organization via cellular phone. It was only when prison authorities finally 
cracked down in the 1990s with a new maximum security prison--known as Almoloya 
de Juarez--for major narcotics offenders that his old organization broke up into 
two factions. 
One known as the 'Tijuana Cartel' is led by his nephews, the 
Arellano-Felix brothers, who are accused of the murder of Cardinal Juan Jose 
Posadas Ocampo. The other, led by his old lieutenants, Hector Palma Salazar and 
Joaquin Guzman Loera, is commonly called the 'Sinaloa Cartel.'
Max Mermelstein, a key manager of the Medellin cartel in the United States, 
once said that he and Fabio Ochoa were searching out landing sites in 
northeastern Mexico in January of 1982. Their negative experiences with corrupt 
and brutal Mexican federal Judicial Police were, however, off-putting. They, 
like Cali's transport representatives, quickly learned that if they were going 
to work in Mexico, they needed connections with Mexican traffickers as middlemen 
and intermediaries to the Mexican PJF and PGR, if they were to be successful.
In the late 1980s, into the vacuum caused by the arrest of the Guadalajara 
cartel leadership, stepped men like Rafael Aguilar and Rafael Munoz Talavera, 
who formed the Juarez Carel and moved some 77 metric tons of cocaine across the 
border to El Paso and Sylmar California. 
On Mexico's eastern border 
(Matamoros-Brownville) border, Juan N. Guerra, initially battled with Olivero 
Chavez Araujo for control. He won, but was eclipsed by his nephew Juan Garcia 
Abrego, who changed the equation and raised Mexican drug trafficking to new 
heights.
Juan Garcia Abrego offered the Colombians, who were suffering interdiction 
losses to US law enforcement in Florida and the Middle Atlantic states, a deal 
they could not refuse. He would guarantee delivery anywhere in the United States 
for 50 percent of the load. He would assume all risks. to do this meant he had 
to stockpile and stash loads in Mexico to replace shipments that might be 
interdicted by US law enforcement. 
As a result, as much as 100 tons of cocaine 
would be stockpiled south of the border. Stockpiling, however, necessitated 
higher and broader levels of corruption to minimize risks, and protect warehouse 
and transit methods. 
According to reports of the Mexican Attorney General's office, 'Juan Garcia 
Abrego is bringing between 150 and 200 metric tons of cocaine a year into this 
country, and is doing so even though he is under pressure now.' 
At the end of 
the 1980s and in the early 1990s PGR spokesman claim 'he was smuggling in 300 
metric tons.' During this period, a kilo of cocaine sold for between $8,000 and 
$9,000 at the Matamoros or Reynosa border. In Houston, it could be resold for 
around $16,000, although Cali operatives sold to their own organization at 
$12,000 to $13,000 in order to give them a competitive edge over other 
distribution groups.
At border prices--a conservative figure--the Garcia Abrego organization was 
wholesaling between $1.1 and $1.6 billion a year, of which around $500 to $800 
million would be gross profit. 
The PGR currently estimates the net worth of 
Garcia Abrego group's, now called the 'Gulf Cartel', to be $10 billion dollars.
The full scope of Garcia Abrego's activities surfaced in February 1993 when 
officials of the Beverly Hills, California, branch of American Express Bank 
International, a subsidiary of the American Express Co., were indicted for 
laundering over $100 million dollars of his money. 
The federal government sought 
some $60 million, but only seized $30 million that moved through McAllen, Texas 
and New York banks. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve fined American Express Bank 
International $950,000 for its compromised behavior. This case quietly rocked 
the U.S. banking and financial communities, for it was the first time the depth 
of the emerging symbiosis between the legitimate financial sector and 
international organized crime was officially acknowledged.
Similar tremors occurred in Mexico in 1994 when the PGR froze 200 million in 
new pesos that Garcio Abrego had laundered through three currency exchange 
houses and Civilian Association and the Monterrey Chamber of Commerce petitioned 
the government for release of the money on the grounds that it was adversely 
affecting local businesses and commerce.
But the fractures in the surface of banking and narco power in Mexico are 
only beginning to emerge. This can be seen in the flight of Cremi and Union 
Banking Corporations entrepeneur, Carlos Cabal Peniche, who granted himself a 
$700 million loan. As Deputy Alejandro Encinas of the Mexican Chamber of 
Deputies Mixed Commission investigating the assassination of Donaldo Colosio 
told El Financiero, Cabal Peniche was made rich by the same group of 
narco-politicians responsible for the presidential candidate's murder. 
Also 
noteworthy, Cabal Peniche is the protege of Mexican Communications and 
Transportation Cabinet Secretary, Emilio Gamboa Patron who, when he was private 
secretary to President Miguel de la Madrid Hurtado, became the young man's 
patron. Gamboa, or his office, appears to be a key target for corruption in the 
cali cartel's plan for Mexico.
Of course, organized crime corruption of banking systems is not new. 
Miguel 
Angel Felix Gallardo sat on the board of Directors of SOMEX Bank's northern 
regional center. And, Tijuana and San Diego Italian-American organized crime 
figure John Alessio had deep connections in both communities' banking sectors 
when he owned the race and dog track in Tijuana. Today, that track's current 
owner, Jorge Hank-Rohn, a Mexican elite member, influential and 'intocable', 
maintains strong connections to Baja California banking, politics, and 
apparently narco power politics in Mexico.
Amado Carilo Fuentes, who also has a close relationship with Miguel Rodriguez 
Orejuela of cali, is Juan Garcia Abrego's main competitor. He is referred to in 
the press as a leader of the 'Pacific' and 'Juarez Cartel.' Operating out of 
Guadalajara and Sonora, he has taken the place of Rafael Aguilar of Torreon, a 
leader of the Juarez Cartel who was assassianted in Cancun, Mexico in 1993. 
Amado Carillo Fuentes approaches the pivot, Juarez, from the west, while Garcia 
Abrego operating out of Tamulipas and Nuevo Leon (Monterrey) contests it from 
the east. This could result in bloody conflict, but if Juan Jose Esparragoza 
Moreno, 'El Azul', the remaining free member of the Guadalajara cartel, is able 
to mediate this and create a 'Paz del Norte' among the major trafficking 
organizations, then a further symbiosos of narco power into the Mexican economic 
and political system will likely occur.
In all there are 11-14 major Mexican drug trafficking cartels, and many more 
minor ones. In other writings I have discussed this; it is simply worth noting 
that the big four discussed here are the key ones with connections to the top of 
the Mexican political system and the Colombian and Peruvian cartels.
Mexico: An Emerging Narco-Democracy? 
Leaked DEA and PGR reports show phone calls from Garcia Abrego's 'Gulf 
Cartel' to the Office of President Salinas de Gortari, as well as to key Cabinet 
Secretaries, such as Emilio Gamboa Patron, Secretary of Communication and 
Transportation (SCT). This latter office is as critical to the evolution of the 
Cali cartel's drug transportation system as it is to NAFTA. 
Its portfolio 
includes the administration of airports, seaports, highways, communication 
lines, and the Federal Highway Police.
Data collected by the Mexican Public Opinion Institute shows the 1994 
election of PRI candidate Ernesto Zedillo as Mexico's next president in the wake 
of the assassination of President Salinas de Gortari's handpicked political 
heir, Donaldo Colosio, cost $1.25 billion (US) or $4.25 billion new pesos. 
Of 
that total, some 3.23 billion new pesos were contributed by the domestic and 
foreign private sector. The legal ceiling is 992 million.
Usually reliable sources say that one of the major contributors from the 
foreign private sector to this campaign was the Cali drug trafficking cartel. 
During the late spring and summer of 1994, they report, Miguel 
Rodriguez-Orejuela of the Cali group sent $40 million (US) dollars, in two 
shipments, to Mexico. While this could have been for economic investment, they 
hypothesize it was for political corruption, to guarantee Cali a superior, 
favored, and protected position in the new administration.
Alan Riding, a long-term observer of Mexico, wrote corruption is 'both the 
glue that holds the Mexican system together and the oil that makes it work.' As 
'glue' it 'seals political alliances', as 'oil' it 'makes the wheels of 
bureaucracy turn.' Mexican public life he described as 'the abuse of power to 
achieve wealth and the abuse of power to achieve power.' 
If this analysis of the 
Mexican political system is accurate, one can readily see why the Cali cartel 
would want preferred seating at the table.
In light of events in Mexico during 1994, Riding's view has been reinforced 
by numerous high level political figures and elite members within the Mexican 
system and even the Catholic Church. But perhaps the most vocal and direct 
confirmation has come from Eduardo Valles Espinoza, a deputy to two Mexican 
Attorney Generals in the PGR and the man in charge of investigating Juan Garcia 
Abrego. 
In his published letter of resignation from the PGR in May 1994 he 
wrote:
I ask: When will we have the courage and political maturity to tell the 
Mexican people that we are living in a narco-democracy. Will we have the 
intellectual capability and ethical strength to say that Amado carrilo, Arellano 
Felix and Juan Garcia Abrego are, inconcievably and degradingly, the promoters 
and even the pillars of our socioeconomic growth and development...
Nobody can 
conceive of a political project in which the narco-trafficking lords and 
financiers are not included, because if he does so he is dead.
Later in Proseco, he commented:
'Narco-power' has deformed the economy; it is a cancer that has generated 
economic, financial, and political dependence, which instead of producing goods 
has created serious problems and distortions ultimately affecting honest 
businessmen.
In the Northeastern Mexico Strata
Northeastern Mexico, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Tamaulipas, Matamoros, and 
Reynosa have always been important narco gateways to the United States.
In recent years, however, Juan Garcia Abrego's Gulf Cartel appears to be 
playing a more visible role in narco power politics. 
His brother, Humberto 
Garcia Abrego, is said to have helped organize Luis Donaldo Colosio's prime 
Presidential fund-raiser in Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas and was invited to sit at the 
head table.
Colosio's route coordinator on the day of his assassination was Federal 
Highway Police Commander, Jorge Vergara Verdejo, from Monterrey and Tamaulipas. 
A second key security official that day was ex-federal Security Directorate 
(DFS) agent, Fernando de la Soto, who had been fired for alleged 
narco-corruption by Attorney General Ignacio Morales Lechuga. He had been hired 
by Colosio's security chief of President Salina's security staff (EMP). 
The states of Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas, and individuals connected to Juan 
Garcia Abrego's organization, also surfaced after the assassination of PRI 
General Secretary Jose Francisco Ruiz Massieu. One alleged intellectual author 
of the crime is Abraham Rubio, the jailed former director of the Acapulco 
Trusteeship, and the Punta Diamante tourist project, ordered closely by the 
government.
He is the father-in-law of Raul Vallardes del Angel, a key 
lieutenant of Juan Garcia Abrego. Abraham Rubio also has ties to the 'old guard' 
as a godparent, with Joaquin Hernandez Galicia, aka 'La Quina', the infamous oil 
workers' union leader ousted by Salinas eralier in his administration. The other 
alleged author of the crime is PRI Congressman Manuel Munoz-Rocha, who is from 
Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas another Garcia Abrego stronghold.
Published PRG reports indicate that Juan Garcia Abrego's key money laundererd 
are Carlos Resendez Bertolousi abd Oscar Malherve of Monterrey. They work with 
and through Marcelino Guerrero and his wife, Marcela Bodenstedt Perlick. Both 
Marcelino and Marcela are ex-PJF agents, and she was a protege of ex-DFS 
Commander, Premier Commandante of the PJF, and one time INTERPOL chief, Miguel 
Aldana. Aldana's connections to drug trafficking were revealed in detail during 
the Camarena murder investigation and trials.
Depositions from arrested traffickers showed that Miguel Aldana was the key 
protector of Caro Quintero, Jaime Figueroa Soto and other traffickers. He was 
present, along with other high level Mexican law enforcement officials, at a 
meeting with the leadership of the Guadalajara cartel to discuss options for 
dealing with the DEA. Out of this meeting came the decison to murder DEA agent, 
Camarena. 
Thus, Marcela Bodenstadt received an excellent early education in high 
level drug corruption and narco power in Mexico.
She apparently learned her lessons well. DEA and Mexican drug intelligence 
CENDRO (Planning Center for Drug Control) reports indicate that she and her 
husband are 'cut-outs' and 'fronts' for Juan Garcia Abrego and the Cali cartel 
to high level political figures in Mexico City, including the Mexican Secretary 
of Communication and Transport, Emilio Gamboa Patron, and his clerk, Arturo 
Morales Portas. They are alleged to have leased houses in Mexico City for drug 
trafficker Luis Medrana Garcia, a Garcia Abrego capo, and they were the 
leaseholders on ahouse in Juarez, where several members of Garcia Abrego's group 
were later arrested. 
In 1993 they helped transfer the body of drug trafficker 
Rafael Aguilar, after he was assassinated in Cancun. They were also named as 
'end recipients' in two large cash transfers $421,950 (US) and $432,509 
(US)--Monterrey to Mexico City--according to 'mules' arrested by the PJF. 
Marcilino Guerrero is also alleged to control 640 hectares in the Cancun-Tulum 
corridor and is proposing a $160 million dollar resort-casino tourism project 
linked to Jorge Hank Rohn, son of Mexican elite member Carlos Hank Gonzalez.
Tourism projects have always been a prime venue for money laundering 
investment by Mexican drug traffickers. Felix Gallardo invested in Hermosillo 
and Puerto Vallarta, as did Chapo-Guzman in Southern Nayarit and Banderas Bay in 
Nuevo Vallarta. In time, we may discover that Juan Garcia Abrego has investments 
in Punta Diamante, as he does in Monterrey and Matamoros, and that the 
Cancun-Tulum project is another example of money laundering symbiosis between 
narco-power and elites in Mexico.
The interest of the drug traffickers and their associates in the Cabinet 
office of the Communications and transport is critical because of the evolution 
in the transportation patterns and methods of the Cali cartel. In 1991, Cali 
aircraft transit patterns shifted from northern to southern Mexico. In 1992, 
Cali increased the shift from small general aviation aircraft and air drops to 
maritime containerized loads, to commerical air via Panama and San Andres 
Island, and to low profile vessels (LPV) and semi-submersibles. 
Cali's influence 
over San Andreas Island offers transport opportunities to Nicaragua and Honduras 
as well as Mexico. Using San Andres, and Panama's Free Trade Zone at Colon, 
1,000 to 1,700 kilos could be sent by LPV, while 2 to 10 metric tons could be 
moved by maritime containers, or by 727 type and larger commerical aircraft 
filing flight plans to avoid surveillance. This shift in transport modalitites, 
however, requires large airports such as La Pesca, near Soto La Marina, 
Tamaulipas which has over 3 kilometers of paved runway.
Cali's new transportation methodology also requires commerical airports, 
business frinst, use of ports, free trade zones, container facilities, trailer 
trucking firms, and railroads. In short, it requires acess, information, 
official forms, and seals taht only an Office of Communication and Transport can 
provide.
One direct impact of this shift in Cali transportation patterns can be seen 
in the economic decline of border areas like Nuevas Casas Grandes, the Juarez 
valley, and Ojinaga where, a few years ago, narco-dollars drove the economy. 
Today as the town hall secretary of Guadalupe, once a key landing site for drug 
planes, Eduardo Ramos put it, 'It so peaceful here that we don't even know the 
federal police.' While Nuevas Casas Grandes, Ascension, Janos, and parts of 
Juarez, Federsal Jurisdiction Police (PJF) Commander Javier Norona Guerrero 
declared, 'People are complaining there is no money because traffickers have 
stopped circulating their cash through various establishments. 
Drug dealing has 
been reduced and, in some towns, businesses are operating with very little money 
too, because of the lack of drug trafficking.' Reports from other areas of 
Chihuahua and eastern Sonora reinforce this, indicating jewelry stores, discos, 
bars and restaurants are suffering from a decline in narco-dollars. All of this 
is an outgrowth of Cali's transportation shift to containers and commercial air, 
as well as shifting narco power relations in Mexico. It also illustrates the 
effects of narco power on local economies. 
A new level or stage of narco relations and symbiosis in drug trafficking in 
Mexico is currently underway. As I have writen elsewhere, in the early years it 
was control of a local area, 'La Plaza', that mattered. Then, it was key towns, 
cities, governors and states. 
For a while in the mid and late 1980s trafficking 
could be tracked by simply watching where various corrupt PJF officials were 
transferred.
Key traffickers and trafficking nodes in a centralized authoritarian system 
like Mexico always needed the 'con permiso' of those within the Federal 
District.
But today, rather than protection percolating up through the PJF, PGR, or military to the party and the private secretaries and bag men around 'Los Pinos', it now appears transnational organized crime and narco power are attempting to operate directly in public and private sector board rooms, with Cabinet level staff and secretaries to plan and coordinate activities for mutual benefits, development, and free trade. Should legitimate and honest elite sector private capitalists object to these new players and arrangements, then a wave of kidnappings can occur to intimidate them back into silence.
There is another reason why cali cartel planners need the high level penetration of the Mexican government at this time. With demand decline and cocaine market saturation in the U.S., Cali has had to find new production efficiencies, as well as product diversification (heroin and marijuana oil) to maintain profits. With high level internal Mexican government support, however, Cali would be in a position to lean on certain Mexican trafficking groups to lower their per kilo share to a more reasonable level.
The Ground is Shaking: US Policy
Calculated Avoidance Mexico is the key geopolitical funnel for the United States economic well being in the hemisphere in the 21st Century. It is also a key partner in emerging trade developments, as well as a vital market and labor pool for the United States. Yet, the Clinton administration foreign policy and national security eyes appear to focus more on Haiti, rather than Mexico.
The tremors that rocked the Mexican political system in 1994, which have deep roots in the political structure and strata of Mexico's authoritarian democracy, had little visible reverberation in Washington, until the collapse of the peso in early 1995 compelled US aid.
In the fall of 1994 Secretary of the Treasury, Lloyd Bensten, led delegations to Mexico where both trade and Mexico's faltering 'War on drugs' were discussed, and incoming President Zedillo was given a personal invitation from President Clinton to visit the White House. After the assassination of Donaldo Colosio the United States offered, and private sector banking and financial community acted, to shore up and support Mexican financial markets.
After the assassination of PRI General Secretary Jose Francisco Ruiz Massieu, US National Security Advisor Anthony Lake offered condolences, and noted, [it] appears to be part of a continuing pattern of violence in Mexico. US Ambassador James Jones described it as 'a senseless act of violence.' The Ambassador's reaction recalled that of his predecessor, John Negroponte, who after cold blooded murders of seven Mexican drug agents were gunned down in ambush by 100 members of the Mexican army; employed by drug traffickers and called the event 'a regrettable accident.'
For recent Washington administrations, whether they be President Bush's or President Clinton's, free trade, investment, development and other economic issues are paramount. Drug trafficking, immigration, environmental concerns, unrest in Chiapas, or the volcanic power struggle currently occurring in Mexico are all issues to be swept under the rug and ignored, so long as they do not affect domestic politics and the US elections.
One can, of course, argue that these avoidant behaviors, and reserved postures by Washington are but good neighbor politics, especially given Mexican sensitivities and historic poor relations between the US and Mexico. That may be. But such mannered myopia and reserve jeopardizes the long run national interests of both nations.
A knowledgeable Mexican official, Eduardo Valles Espinosa, before fleeing into exile, cried out that Mexico had become a 'narco-democracy.' In Washington, despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, such chilling words appear to fall on deaf ears and are subject to be discussed only in 'executive session.'
For the Clinton Administration, drugs, organized crime and drug trafficking are but minor priorities in the long term game of global trade, economics, and power politics. The drug policies of the Clinton Administration appear to be little more than 'Vietnamization', a turning over of the 'War on Drugs' to the Andean nations and a pulling back of US forces and resources within the borders of the United States. What is happening in Mexico should show us such a neo-isolationism on these issues is neither in the national interest of the United States nor those of our trading partners. Drug trafficking today is a lot more than treatment of what is happening on the streets of Detroit. It is transnational organized crime, narco-corruption, and destabilization, that confront the US and the world's democracies.
But today, rather than protection percolating up through the PJF, PGR, or military to the party and the private secretaries and bag men around 'Los Pinos', it now appears transnational organized crime and narco power are attempting to operate directly in public and private sector board rooms, with Cabinet level staff and secretaries to plan and coordinate activities for mutual benefits, development, and free trade. Should legitimate and honest elite sector private capitalists object to these new players and arrangements, then a wave of kidnappings can occur to intimidate them back into silence.
There is another reason why cali cartel planners need the high level penetration of the Mexican government at this time. With demand decline and cocaine market saturation in the U.S., Cali has had to find new production efficiencies, as well as product diversification (heroin and marijuana oil) to maintain profits. With high level internal Mexican government support, however, Cali would be in a position to lean on certain Mexican trafficking groups to lower their per kilo share to a more reasonable level.
The Ground is Shaking: US Policy
Calculated Avoidance Mexico is the key geopolitical funnel for the United States economic well being in the hemisphere in the 21st Century. It is also a key partner in emerging trade developments, as well as a vital market and labor pool for the United States. Yet, the Clinton administration foreign policy and national security eyes appear to focus more on Haiti, rather than Mexico.
The tremors that rocked the Mexican political system in 1994, which have deep roots in the political structure and strata of Mexico's authoritarian democracy, had little visible reverberation in Washington, until the collapse of the peso in early 1995 compelled US aid.
In the fall of 1994 Secretary of the Treasury, Lloyd Bensten, led delegations to Mexico where both trade and Mexico's faltering 'War on drugs' were discussed, and incoming President Zedillo was given a personal invitation from President Clinton to visit the White House. After the assassination of Donaldo Colosio the United States offered, and private sector banking and financial community acted, to shore up and support Mexican financial markets.
After the assassination of PRI General Secretary Jose Francisco Ruiz Massieu, US National Security Advisor Anthony Lake offered condolences, and noted, [it] appears to be part of a continuing pattern of violence in Mexico. US Ambassador James Jones described it as 'a senseless act of violence.' The Ambassador's reaction recalled that of his predecessor, John Negroponte, who after cold blooded murders of seven Mexican drug agents were gunned down in ambush by 100 members of the Mexican army; employed by drug traffickers and called the event 'a regrettable accident.'
For recent Washington administrations, whether they be President Bush's or President Clinton's, free trade, investment, development and other economic issues are paramount. Drug trafficking, immigration, environmental concerns, unrest in Chiapas, or the volcanic power struggle currently occurring in Mexico are all issues to be swept under the rug and ignored, so long as they do not affect domestic politics and the US elections.
One can, of course, argue that these avoidant behaviors, and reserved postures by Washington are but good neighbor politics, especially given Mexican sensitivities and historic poor relations between the US and Mexico. That may be. But such mannered myopia and reserve jeopardizes the long run national interests of both nations.
A knowledgeable Mexican official, Eduardo Valles Espinosa, before fleeing into exile, cried out that Mexico had become a 'narco-democracy.' In Washington, despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, such chilling words appear to fall on deaf ears and are subject to be discussed only in 'executive session.'
For the Clinton Administration, drugs, organized crime and drug trafficking are but minor priorities in the long term game of global trade, economics, and power politics. The drug policies of the Clinton Administration appear to be little more than 'Vietnamization', a turning over of the 'War on Drugs' to the Andean nations and a pulling back of US forces and resources within the borders of the United States. What is happening in Mexico should show us such a neo-isolationism on these issues is neither in the national interest of the United States nor those of our trading partners. Drug trafficking today is a lot more than treatment of what is happening on the streets of Detroit. It is transnational organized crime, narco-corruption, and destabilization, that confront the US and the world's democracies.
Mexico is the worlds first true narcocracy..been sayin it for two years
ReplyDeleteBam, proof right there american banks launder some of the bloodiest $$ in the world...
ReplyDeleteOk, let say it is the world's first true narcocracy...What does that mean for Mexico/U.S.? What does this mean for Mexico's future and it's people, under this type of government? It seems that it too late to change what Mexico has become, unless you are willing to take out ALL the politicians, from state governors on up; maybe even starting with city mayors. The corruption is too entrenched to just think that electing a new president under another political party will change anything. So now what? What can be done, outside of a total revolution by the Mexican people? Accept it and do Nothing...or popular uprising...? WDYT brito?
ReplyDeleteNo it not
ReplyDeleteCivil war is going on in Mexico: government allied with cartels against the people.
ReplyDeleteI see no end in sight, not while US dollars fund the narcos and corrupt elites in government.
Holy shit!!! this is the NWO not new world order but NARCO WORLD ORDER,its coming too city's near you!!!
ReplyDeleteonly a mass uprising of the people can do anything..both in Mexico ..and the USA...but there is no heart for it in the USA...and even though there may be some heart for it in Mexico...the people are helpless against the black clad NWO policia...i cannot offer any solution ..other than to hope that some day the demand /supply scenerio will somehow change
ReplyDeletemaybe the USA will have another civil war soon and it will affect the demand side ...or the slimmest of hope ..that the USA will legalize ..but that will never happen ..as we all know ..the same people controlling the supply in Mexico ..also control the demand in the USA...
the evil grows stronger every day..madness overtakes the land...darkness is coming fast..i wish i could offer a solution..but i cannot
try to prepare ..take care of your family..remember all good people are your family...is there hope ?...sure ..always there is hope ..the light at the end of the tunnel
and we stand with our eyes looking up to the sky silent.while our hearts bleed invisible ..looking vainly for rescue from the gods
If the condition for moving drugs from the Mexico into the US is that Mexico is corrupt THEN why is not the condition that in order to move those same drugs be within the US, the US must also be corrupt???
ReplyDeleteIs the US corrupt?
If not, why can those same drugs travel through the US?
... maybe US cops are dumber, less motivated worse equipped ... if not, then the answer must be that the US is just as corrupt as Mexico, or what else?
The u.s is the most corrupt in the world more then Mexico jst tat they hide it better cus they truly control wats pt on newspapers t.v ect... altho it may hurt u Americans bt open ur eyes and see reality.
ReplyDelete